something clever
Thursday, June 6, 2013
Trust (The Road part II)
I don't think I would be as quick to trust the man at the end as the son is. He has seen so much of the evil in people and begun trusting things that turned out to be evil that it would be almost impossible to start trusting someone again like that. I would no doubt go with them. There really is no other choice for the boy; he is miles away from anything and I don't think he has what it takes quite yet to not only find food, but to not give it to every wayward stranger he meets, leaving next to nothing for himself. Though I would go with them, I wouldn't let my guard down for a while. I might even pretend that the gun didn't work anymore and say I threw it away and that I was bluffing. Then I would hide it in my coat at all times, keeping it a secret, waiting for the moment when I would have to do what my father always prepared me for.
Tuesday, June 4, 2013
On Screen: The Road
When I really enjoy a book, I am usually highly critical of the movie. Too often, a lot of the substance of a book is lost in favor of flashy Hollywood moments designed to bring in an audience. One might think that The Road, with its endless, rambling walking scenes and dry, tutorial-like descriptions of mundane actions would be a director's nightmare and the perfect candidate for a disappointing film like this. Luckily, such was not the case.
The movie of The Road was on point. It almost perfectly captured the atmosphere of the book. As I read the book myself, I envisioned the whole long road as a rambling rural highway, only passing by the occasional family farm or small wild-west-esque ghost town. But the images in the movie reminded me of what the author must have actually intended. They walked through cities and in towns and over underpasses and under bridges. The forests and the buildings they went in looked exactly as I imagined. The casting was great, and the movie didn't really cut out much except for the boat. The use of Occasional voice over was effective and powerful, and the tone of voice was monotone and had an almost bored quality, reminiscent of the tone of the book.
I liked the movie a lot, but I had one problem with it. At the very end, it shows some of the other people that were with the stranger that takes in the son, including the young boy he thought he saw in one town and a dog that barks at the roof of the bunker. It is played off like this group has been following them since almost the beginning of the movie. I didn't get this from the book, and I don't see how it is possible they could have been followed for so long. Part of the significance of the boy deciding to trust the man at the end is that he is still able to keep hope and go with this person he doesn't know despite all these bad people he has seen. But in the movie, the whole family is waiting visibly while the man walks up to the boy on the beach. This takes away from the power of the boy's decision for me.
Despite this, I enjoyed the movie immensely, and it was very emotional. I think it works as a great companion to the book, giving face to the story. I would recommend it to everybody, and I will definitely watch it again.
The movie of The Road was on point. It almost perfectly captured the atmosphere of the book. As I read the book myself, I envisioned the whole long road as a rambling rural highway, only passing by the occasional family farm or small wild-west-esque ghost town. But the images in the movie reminded me of what the author must have actually intended. They walked through cities and in towns and over underpasses and under bridges. The forests and the buildings they went in looked exactly as I imagined. The casting was great, and the movie didn't really cut out much except for the boat. The use of Occasional voice over was effective and powerful, and the tone of voice was monotone and had an almost bored quality, reminiscent of the tone of the book.
I liked the movie a lot, but I had one problem with it. At the very end, it shows some of the other people that were with the stranger that takes in the son, including the young boy he thought he saw in one town and a dog that barks at the roof of the bunker. It is played off like this group has been following them since almost the beginning of the movie. I didn't get this from the book, and I don't see how it is possible they could have been followed for so long. Part of the significance of the boy deciding to trust the man at the end is that he is still able to keep hope and go with this person he doesn't know despite all these bad people he has seen. But in the movie, the whole family is waiting visibly while the man walks up to the boy on the beach. This takes away from the power of the boy's decision for me.
Despite this, I enjoyed the movie immensely, and it was very emotional. I think it works as a great companion to the book, giving face to the story. I would recommend it to everybody, and I will definitely watch it again.
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
End Times (The Road part I)
Cormac McCarthy does a brilliant job of describing nothing. The bleak sameness of the empty, burnt landscape is evident in his constant, almost tiresome use of the words "gray" and "ash": "gray light"(p.4) "days more gray each one than what had gone before" (p. 3), "ashen daylight" (p. 5), "shuffling through the ash" (p. 6), and that's just from the first few pages. But his use of these words is only rivaled by the use of the phrase "the road." It is very obvious how much he uses it because the title of a book or movie in context always jumps out at you. He could have used more creative ways to describe the actual road, like using synonyms to avoid repeating the same word and sound better. The road itself represents hope. It is a path with an unknown end, and the father and son keep hope that they will always find some food further along the road. "The road," peppered across the pages, is a constant reminder of the hopefulness that is the central, sometimes invisible mood of the book, a theme that I'm worried is lost to the casual reader. I am an optimist to a fault, so I don't think I would kill myself if I were a survivor in this barren wasteland. Not that I would be exactly happy, but I feel confident that I could find some grain of beauty in the empty, ashen beach of the world. That would be all I needed to carry on.
Thursday, April 25, 2013
Dear parents,
The number one rule of good parenting: patience. It is trendy for kids to act like they hate their parents, but if you are patient enough to muscle through those years you will be thanked. The most important thing to remember is that they will always love you, and that they know you will always love them. Whether you tell them every day or once in their life, your kids understand this unconditionally.
Give them space, but don't let them walk all over you. Discipline is hard but necessary. Try to be as understanding as possible, but know that solid ground rules must be set. The main role of a parent is to keep their children safe, so safety must be at the forefront of any decisions you make. That being said, let kids be kids.
Whether you fit the description or not, you are being seen as the perfect example of an adult. The decisions you make and the actions you take have an effect on every moral trait of your offspring. You have a huge responsibility on your shoulders, so act responsibly.
You have been entrusted with this delicate, new soul encased in a tiny human, and you must love and nurture and mold it into a wonderful human being with its own stories and opinions and ideas. Though your job never ends, the day your child greets you as a friend is the day you have succeeded.
Love, a daughter
Give them space, but don't let them walk all over you. Discipline is hard but necessary. Try to be as understanding as possible, but know that solid ground rules must be set. The main role of a parent is to keep their children safe, so safety must be at the forefront of any decisions you make. That being said, let kids be kids.
Whether you fit the description or not, you are being seen as the perfect example of an adult. The decisions you make and the actions you take have an effect on every moral trait of your offspring. You have a huge responsibility on your shoulders, so act responsibly.
You have been entrusted with this delicate, new soul encased in a tiny human, and you must love and nurture and mold it into a wonderful human being with its own stories and opinions and ideas. Though your job never ends, the day your child greets you as a friend is the day you have succeeded.
Love, a daughter
Monday, April 8, 2013
Civic Duty
I think that it should be a civic duty for all people to have empathy and withhold judgement, specifically in public. It is all too easy to get angry at other people for petty things like the way they dress or talk. And people are so paranoid about being judged negatively that they often restrict themselves and put on a facade in public. I know this is really cliché, but you can meet a lot of interesting people when you look past outward appearances.
Everyone has bad days, and some people are just always exceptionally grumpy. It is hard to be patient with these people, especially on YOUR bad days, but chances are you will never see that person again. If someone grimaces at you on the bus, flash them a smile. I challenge the world to make every human interaction positive. One has to remember that everybody has their own struggles, and that something as simple as a smile or even a compliment from a stranger can make somebody's day.
P.S. dear Mr. McCarthy I did my Integration blog, so you can check that while you're here cool thanks
Everyone has bad days, and some people are just always exceptionally grumpy. It is hard to be patient with these people, especially on YOUR bad days, but chances are you will never see that person again. If someone grimaces at you on the bus, flash them a smile. I challenge the world to make every human interaction positive. One has to remember that everybody has their own struggles, and that something as simple as a smile or even a compliment from a stranger can make somebody's day.
P.S. dear Mr. McCarthy I did my Integration blog, so you can check that while you're here cool thanks
Sunday, April 7, 2013
Integration in America
Chicago is a famously segregated city. There are often sharp divides between neighborhoods. Devon feels like a completely different world than Wicker Park, which is the polar opposite of Pilsen. Every street in the city has its own culture and background. This is seen by many as a bad thing: when communities stay separate, there can be hostility between groups and the world views of members remain singular and biased. It is true that this country has a past riddled with oppressed groups that have had to struggle for their basic rights, and it is true that this discrimination still exists. But, having grown up in Logan Square, it was at first hard for me to believe that there are still such awful people because I see so little of them. I went to a diverse grammar school and go to a very diverse high school. One of the things that worries me the most about the future is that pretty much any college I decide to go to will have significantly bigger populations of only a few types of people. I have loved going to completely integrated schools. But by no means do I think that anything should change about the way Chicago neighborhoods work. You can go anywhere in the city and experience the culture and foods of every ethnicity. Though certain areas have residents of mostly one or two ethnicities, it isn't weird to see a white person in China Town or a black person in Greek Town. People can celebrate their own cultures and feel a sense of belonging in the places they live, while still being exposed to others. It's a win/win situation. The kids that get to go to schools other than their neighborhood school get to be exposed to this even earlier.
The only way to promote integration is to fight poverty. There are so many more white kids going to college and succeeding because there are more white families able to afford to live in nice neighborhoods and send their children to good schools. I may be biased, but Affirmative Action is unfair and counterproductive. If we really want to solve this problem, we need to go to its source, which is rooted in unbalanced racial class distributions.
The only way to promote integration is to fight poverty. There are so many more white kids going to college and succeeding because there are more white families able to afford to live in nice neighborhoods and send their children to good schools. I may be biased, but Affirmative Action is unfair and counterproductive. If we really want to solve this problem, we need to go to its source, which is rooted in unbalanced racial class distributions.
Monday, March 11, 2013
Poverty As a Choice?
I think that poverty is a situation you are born into, just like any other financial class. It is definitely possible to move between classes, but it is harder than most people think. The reason that stories about poor people coming into money or rich people loosing it all are so popular is that it isn't very common. When I look back at my parents' childhood, I see a story of success. Both of their families had a lot of kids and not much money, but now everybody is doing pretty well. I am proud of this aspect of my family, and it gives me hope for the future. But I don't look forward to a future where I have bucketfuls of money and a private jet. I will spare you of my nasty stereotype of super rich people. I am more scared of becoming poor than ambitious to be rich. I would be content being in this same financial situation forever.
I believe that this way of thinking is what is keeping so many people in poverty. In All Souls, the author remembers how they looked at the black people in Roxbury and would do anything to not look as poor as them. As long as someone was worse off, it didn't matter how poor they were. They scoffed at the middle class liberals and marveled at their rich cousins and their strange habits. The people of Old Colony belonged there. Why venture into a strange place when you know and love the community of your current home?
I believe that this way of thinking is what is keeping so many people in poverty. In All Souls, the author remembers how they looked at the black people in Roxbury and would do anything to not look as poor as them. As long as someone was worse off, it didn't matter how poor they were. They scoffed at the middle class liberals and marveled at their rich cousins and their strange habits. The people of Old Colony belonged there. Why venture into a strange place when you know and love the community of your current home?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)